No “Social Practice” Art is complete without selfies
.
Mark Twain once observed ““The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter—it’s the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.” The same analogy can be applied to the almost right and right principles of “social justice” versus “justice.”
“Social Justice” claims to be about fairness, which is a highly desirable outcome. But the term is a manipulative Newspeak euphemism for envy, revenge and oppression. What social justice actually does is crush people into group identities which have been assigned favored and non-favored status by power hungry establishment elitists. Preemptively claiming group guilt or privilege is an abstraction which does not recognize the actuality that people are individuals, responsible and accountable for their own actions. It’s the opposite of real justice.
We have come to call this collusion against the values of Western civilization Postmodernism. Social justice ideas are the propaganda our corrupt governing class uses to distract and inflame their mob rule shock troops. These cunning perpetrators use art as one of the weapons in their arsenal to undermine the rule of law. The totalitarians utilize their money and connections to enforce the results they want. Our universities are willing accomplices to this abuse of the arts.
Artnet reports on their latest maneuver: “Yale School of Art Launches New Art and Social Justice Initiative” . They positively preen about it:
“The program, developed by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Dean of the Yale School of Art, Marta Kuzma, is funded by a recent $750,000 donation from an anonymous Yale alum. The money will be put toward research, scholarships, projects, and other academic resources across the graduate school of art, as well as a series of lectures and panels open to the whole university, aimed at exploring the intersection of art and social engagement.
“The initiative is largely a product of an ongoing conversation between faculty (Kuzma, in particular) and graduate students about addressing issues around artistic production amid the current social and political climate. This is, however, part of a larger trend, with numerous MFA programs reframing themselves around ‘social practice’ art.”
“In the blind alleys we were directed into, the criteria being used to evaluate the works seemed on the surface completely arbitrary. But in fact, the feebler the efforts were, the more opportunities it gave to launch into peripheral diatribes regarding half-baked sociology, aggravated psychology, convoluted technobabble and the like. This was the kind of talk that got these teachers really excited, subtly reinforcing that this was where our attention ought to be focused. They were indoctrinating us into the Postmodern way.
“Rewarding certain behaviors encourages more of those types of behaviors. And so most students were dutifully herded into producing slapdash experimental works, and talking about activism, therapy and pedantic minutia, rather than trying to understand if an artwork functioned effectively on its own terms, as art. It was easier to adopt the lofty lecturing tone of the instructors, to curry favor by asserting the approved beliefs and attitudes.
“Encouraging attitudes of grievance and victimization, or highlighting incidental matters of process or technique, does not lead to powerful art. But it does lead to the generation of thought police, dependent personality disorder types, and detached technocrats—all useful cogs for the Leftist machine. The indoctrination continues.”
See the previous articles in The Death of University Art Programs series linked below:
Part 3: Ignorance as a Method of Critique
UPDATE: Welcome Instapundit readers! Please visit other posts for more commentary on the state of the arts.
You second paragraph describing “Social Justice” was SO SPOT ON! Bravo!
Thanks!
I see programs of ‘social engagement’ popping up in emails from my alma mater, Moore College of Art in Philadelphia. So disappointing. Of course, it’s a women’s college, so they figure the students are ripe for this kind of nonsense. For years the Illustration Major, from which I graduated, is the largest in the school, & has great skilled teachers who rightly steer clear of that idiocy – their students want to work hard and earn a living when they graduate. But the leadership at the school is always fussing over & promoting the fine art departments, which produce the least real value.
Brilliant analysis of a frightening trend. Thank you.
Glad you had a solid and practical experience before the colleges lost their collective minds
Thanks, it’s crazy time we live in for sure. The battle has begun.
Social justice is to justice as military music is to music.
Richard Bledsoe: The battle began at the dawn of civilization, and is continuing.
They don’t know how to act as they lose, they thought it was all over. We will educate them.
As a recovering art history student (MA NYU Institute of Fine Arts, 1984) who dearly loves the High Conceptualism of the late 20th century AS A FORM OF ENTERTAINMENT, I recommend to you this admirably short and LOL-funny mystery novel: http://www.worldcat.org/title/killing-the-emperors/oclc/1014249691&referer=brief_results
Come to think of it, you’d probably enjoy many more of the titles in the long-running series of the adventures of Baroness Ida ‘Jack’ Troutbeck, as I have.
The intersectionality of sanity and art has left the building.
Contrast the world’s ever-widening cultural desert, strangling major creative effort in all venues from the early-middle 1960s on, with the extraordinary transnational accomplishments of c. 1875 – 1900.
For decades now –on-balance from 1918, the end of the Great War– only info-tech and esoteric scientific disciplines have any interest. Given zero memorable painting or sculpture, no music composed, no lasting novels or poetry written [name any], only cartoonish pop-cult daubs, droning monotonic noises, soap-operatic melodramas, have competed for philistine commercial plaudits. (Think the estimable Bob Dylan’s Nobel citation for– literature?)
As for the humanities… “history” is non-existent; “philosophy” is indistinguishable from randomly generated parodies; “scholarship” has degenerated to mere casuistry, a faux-academic pretense vitiated by sectarian bigots of precisely zero intellectual, moral, or withal spiritual attainment.
How long will this sad state persist? We’d say, ’til about AD 2040, 72 years past 1968’s generational inflection-point, 36 years from 2004. The rule is: Fathers create, sons inherit, grandsons squander, and great-grandsons repeat the process. Just as the Soviet Union lasted from 1917 – 1989, so we expect our sadsack Boomers, Generation Wuss et al. to go their way when the cohort born c. 2018 – ’22 in boredom as well as self-defense bestirs itself to call out, “Halt– enough!”
ART, n. This word has no definition. Its origin is related as follows by the ingenious Father Gassalasca Jape, S.J.One day a wag — what would the wretch be at? —
Shifted a letter of the cipher RAT,
And said it was a god’s name! Straight arose
Fantastic priests and postulants (with shows,
And mysteries, and mummeries, and hymns,
And disputations dire that lamed their limbs)
To serve his temple and maintain the fires,
Expound the law, manipulate the wires.
Amazed, the populace the rites attend,
Believe whate’er they cannot comprehend,
And, inly edified to learn that two
Half-hairs joined so and so (as Art can do)
Have sweeter values and a grace more fit
Than Nature’s hairs that never have been split,
Bring cates and wines for sacrificial feasts,
And sell their garments to support the priests.
Hey thanks for the recommendation! I see the pleasure in spoofing Postmodern pretentiousness-I saw amusing examples of this on some British TV shows: Spaced, and Absolutely Fabulous. Both had bad-contemporary-art themed episodes.
Not only left the building, it’s playing in traffic.
Very interesting observation. I’m afraid we don’t have that much time to survive as a nation at the current trajectory. We need to move that timetable up a few decades.
Brilliant, thanks!
” they thought it was all over” and because of this they have become lazy, fat, and stupid. Which has brought them to this point as you say “They don’t know how to act as they lose”, and it is funny, but they are still dangerous.
I forgot to credit the above poem, it’s by Ambrose Bierce from the “Devil’s Dictionary”.
They are dangerous as a mass I suppose, but we now have leadership out there that shows us the way to beat them: don’t play by their rules.
A wise man
[…] Part 4: The Subsidized Sedition of Establishment Art Schools […]
[…] Part 4: The Subsidized Sedition of Establishment Art Schools […]